Obviously, the answer depends on what you’re looking for from your new vehicle, but a comparison between two similarly priced models can help you make an informed decision.
The Volvo XC40 vs. XC60 Recharge practicality, compared
When it comes to space for legs, gear, and groceries, the two SUVs’ offerings are less equal. The XC60 has just a few more inches of room for passengers, but you can find a full 16 cubic feet more space for cargo behind its backseats than in its all-electric family member.
When running on its battery, the extended range XC60 offers 63 MPGe. Otherwise, its gas engine runs a more conventional 23 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway.
Volvo’s safety record has fooled many drivers into thinking its vehicles are boring, but the Swedish brand’s models offer plenty of pep, and these two Recharge models are no exception.
Both vehicles offer exceptional power. The XC60 with the most umph—the T8 eAWD Inscription Extended—maxxes out at a whopping 455 hp and can reach 60 mph in 4.5 seconds. But that’s the top-tier powertrain. Other engine options offer between 247 and 400 hp.
For the XC40, every version gets the same two electric motors offering a combined 402 hp. The powertrain can reach 60 mph in 4.2 seconds.
Even if you could, you probably aren’t planning to bring your Volvo SUV to the race track any time soon. Still, both the XC60 Recharge and XC40 Recharge offer responsive and refined driving experiences, no matter where you’re headed.
Volvo XC40 Recharge vs. XC60 Recharge: cost of ownership
It might surprise you, but the all-electric XC40 Recharge actually has a lower starting price than its hybrid counterpart, the XC60 Recharge.
The cheapest XC60 with an electric motor has a manufacture-suggested retail price (MSRP) of $54,250—that’s $2,550 more than the cheapest XC40 Recharge. The price difference makes car insurance for the XC60 more expensive on average as well.
No long forms. No calling around. No hard work. Just savings. The average Jerry user saves over $800 a year on car insurance.