| Alabama is a pure contributory negligence state. That means you can only collect damages after an accident if you are 0% at fault. |
| Alaska is a pure comparative negligence state, meaning you can collect damages after an accident unless you are found to be 100% at fault. |
| Arizona is a pure comparative negligence state, which means you can seek damages following an accident unless you are 100% at fault. |
| Arkansas is a modified-comparative negligence state. That means that you can collect compensation after an accident unless you are 50% or more at fault. |
| California is a pure comparative negligence state, meaning you can collect compensation after an accident unless you are 100% at fault. |
| Colorado is a modified-comparative negligence state, meaning that as long as you’re 49% or less at fault, you can collect damages after an accident. |
| Connecticut uses 51% modified-comparative negligence laws. That means that you can collect compensation as long as you’re less than 51% at fault. |
| Delaware is a 51% modified-comparative negligence state. You can collect compensation following an accident as long as you were less than 51% at fault. |
| Florida recently switched to a comparative negligence model, meaning that you can collect damages if you are less than 51% at fault. |
| Georgia is a modified-comparative negligence state, meaning you can collect damages as long as you’re 49% or less at fault. |
| Hawaii has a 51% comparative negligence law, meaning you can seek compensation after an accident as long as you are less than 51% at fault. |
| Idaho uses modified-comparative negligence laws. That means you can collect damages after an accident as long as you are 49% or less at fault. |
| Illinois follows a 51% modified-comparative negligence law, meaning that you can collect compensation for losses following an accident if you are less than 51% at fault. |
| Indiana has a 51% modified-comparative negligence law, which states that you’re entitled to compensation following an accident if you’re less than 51% at fault. |
| Iowa uses a 51% modified-comparative negligence law, meaning Iowa drivers are entitled to damages after an accident if they’re less than 51% at fault. |
| Kansas has a modified-comparative negligence law stating that Kansas drivers are entitled to compensation after an accident if they are less than 50% at fault. |
| Kentucky has a pure comparative negligence law that says Kentucky drivers can collect compensation after an accident if they are less than 100% at fault. |
| Under Louisiana’s pure comparative negligence law, drivers are eligible for compensation following an accident if they are less than 100% at fault. |
| Maine has a modified-comparative negligence law that says drivers are eligible for compensation after an accident if they are 49% or less at fault. |
| Maryland has a contributory negligence law stating that drivers are ineligible for compensation following an accident unless they are 0% responsible. |
| Under Massachusetts’ 51% modified-comparative negligence law, drivers can collect damages following an accident if they are found less than 51% at fault. |
| Michigan follows a 51% modified-comparative negligence law, meaning that drivers can collect damages if they are 50% or less at fault. |
| Minnesota has a 51% modified-comparative negligence law stating that drivers are entitled to compensation after an accident if they are 50% or less at fault. |
| Under Mississippi’s pure comparative negligence law, drivers are eligible to collect damages if they are less than 100% at fault. |
| Missouri has a pure comparative negligence law, meaning drivers can collect damages after an accident if they are less than 100% at fault. |
| Montana follows a 51% modified-comparative negligence law, which means that drivers are eligible for compensation after an accident if they are 50% or less at fault. |
| Under Nebraska’s modified-comparative negligence law, drivers are eligible to collect damages following an accident if they are less than 50% at fault. |
| Nevada’s 51% modified-comparative negligence law states that drivers can collect damages if they are less than 51% at fault. |
| Under New Hampshire’s 51% modified-comparative negligence law, drivers are eligible to collect damages after an accident if they are less than 51% at fault. |
| New Jersey follows a 51% modified-comparative negligence law, meaning you can seek damages after an accident if you are less than 51% at fault. |
| Under New Mexico’s pure comparative negligence law, drivers can collect damages after an accident unless they are 100% at fault. |
| New York is a pure comparative negligence state, meaning you are eligible for compensation after an accident unless you are 100% at fault. |
| Under North Carolina’s contributory negligence law, you are ineligible for compensation following an accident unless you are 0% at fault. |
| Under North Dakota’s modified-comparative negligence law, you can collect damages following an accident if you are less than 50% at fault. |
| Ohio follows a 51% modified-comparative negligence law, meaning you’re eligible for compensation after an accident if you are less than 51% at fault. |
| Under Oklahoma’s 51% modified-comparative negligence law, drivers are eligible for compensation after an accident if they are less than 51% at fault. |
| Oregon follows a 51% modified-comparative negligence law stating that drivers can collect damages after an accident if they are less than 51% at fault. |
| Pennsylvania has a 51% modified-comparative negligence law, meaning drivers can collect compensation following an accident if they are less than 51% at fault. |
| Under Rhode Island’s pure comparative negligence law, drivers are eligible for compensation following an accident unless they are 100% at fault. |
| South Carolina follows a 51% modified-comparative negligence law stating that drivers can collect damages after an accident if they are less than 51% at fault. |
| South Dakota follows a slight-gross negligence comparative law stating that drivers can only collect damages after an accident if one party displayed “slight” negligence while the other party displayed “gross” negligence. |
| Under Tennessee’s modified-comparative negligence law, drivers are eligible for compensation after an accident if they are less than 50% at fault. |
| Texas follows a 51% modified-comparative negligence law stating that you are eligible for compensation after an accident if you are less than 51% at fault. |
| Utah has a modified-comparative negligence law, meaning drivers can collect damages after an accident if they are less than 50% at fault. |
| Vermont has a 51% modified-comparative negligence law, meaning that you are eligible for compensation after an accident if you are less than 51% at fault. |
| Under Virginia’s contributory negligence law, drivers are ineligible for compensation after an accident unless they are 0% at fault. |
| Under Washington’s pure comparative negligence law, you can collect damages after an accident unless you are 100% at fault. |
| West Virginia follows a 51% modified-comparative negligence law, meaning that drivers can collect damages following an accident if they are less than 51% at fault. |
| Wisconsin has a 51% modified-comparative negligence law that allows drivers to collect compensation after an accident if they are less than 51% at fault. |
| Under Wyoming’s 51% modified-comparative negligence law, drivers are eligible for compensation after an accident if they are less than 51% at fault. |