Was getting this non owners car insurance policy really a good idea?

I live in Seattle and rent cars frequently. Rather than getting the rental car coverage, I bought a non owners policy with Progressive. It meets all the state liability requirements, but now I have buyer's remorse. Did I get enough coverage?

Apr 29, 2021
Answer provided by
avatar
Shannon Martin
Answered at Apr 29, 2021
“Deciding between a non owners car insurance policy and the rental car insurance is a tough choice. Since you already purchased the non owners policy, you may just want to take a closer look at the limits.
One mistake people make with non owners policies is to assume that since they don’t own the car, they don’t need a lot of coverage. That is incorrect! You should carry as much liability as you can afford on this type of policy as well. Washington has a state-minimum coverage of 25/50/25.
The recommended limits for most people are 100/300/50. This represents $100,000 per person and $300,000 per accident toward bodily injury payments and $50,000 per accident for property damage payments.
Also, make sure the non owners policy has coverage for comprehensive insurance and collision insurance.
If you have limits that you are comfortable with and are still saving money, you made the right choice! “
Car InsuranceState Insurance Minimums
thumb-up

Did this answer help you?

Ask us a question by email and we will respond within a few days.
thumb-up

Have a different question?

You can meet us at our office and discuss the details of your question.

Easiest way to compare and buy car insurance

√
No long forms
√
No spam or unwanted phone calls
√
Quotes from top insurance companies